摘要：使用脚本测试。
目录
云服务器配置：
型号 : 快杰型 O
CPU : 1核 （Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz 2.39 GHz）
内存 : 2G
带宽 : 2M
磁盘 : 40G （SSD）
虚拟 : KVM
IP : IPv4 x 1 （BGP）
内网 : 支持内网互通
数据中心 : 上海二区 CPU Model : Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake)
CPU Cores : 1 Cores 2494.140 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
OS : CentOS 7.6.1810 (64 Bit) KVM
AES-NI : Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled
Kernel : 4.19.0-9.el7.ucloud.x86_64
Total Space : 1.9 GB / 40.0 GB
Total RAM : 67 MB / 1917 MB (126 MB Buff)
Total SWAP : 0 MB / 0 MB
Uptime : 0 days 20 hour 22 min
Load Average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
TCP CC : cubic
ASN & ISP : AS4812, UCLOUD
Organization : Shanghai UCloud Information Technology Company Limited
Location : Beijing, China / CN
Region : Beijing
#dd 1Mx1k fdatasync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.7801 s, 77.9 MB/s
#dd 64kx16k fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.7582 s, 78.0 MB/s
#dd 1Mx1k dsync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.7411 s, 78.1 MB/s
#dd 64kx16k dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.9099 s, 77.2 MB/s4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=1 time=90.6 us (warmup)
4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=2 time=130.8 us
4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=3 time=180.3 us
4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=4 time=206.4 us
4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=5 time=192.3 us
4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=6 time=177.7 us
4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=7 time=196.3 us
4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=8 time=234.3 us (slow)
4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=9 time=195.1 us
4 KiB <<< /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1): request=10 time=204.8 us
--- /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
9 requests completed in 1.72 ms, 36 KiB read, 5.24 k iops, 20.5 MiB/s
generated 10 requests in 9.00 s, 40 KiB, 1 iops, 4.44 KiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 130.8 us / 190.9 us / 234.3 us / 26.4 us
#IOPing seek rate
--- /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
11.3 k requests completed in 2.99 s, 44.1 MiB read, 3.78 k iops, 14.8 MiB/s
generated 11.3 k requests in 3.00 s, 44.1 MiB, 3.76 k iops, 14.7 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 57.6 us / 264.8 us / 3.43 ms / 204.4 us
#IOPing sequential
--- /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
898 requests completed in 2.98 s, 224.5 MiB read, 301 iops, 75.3 MiB/s
generated 899 requests in 3.00 s, 224.8 MiB, 299 iops, 74.9 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 1.86 ms / 3.32 ms / 4.19 ms / 502.4 us
#IOPing cached
--- /root/benchmark/ (xfs /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
2.45 M requests completed in 2.86 s, 9.34 GiB read, 854.8 k iops, 3.26 GiB/s
generated 2.45 M requests in 3.00 s, 9.34 GiB, 816.0 k iops, 3.11 GiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 460 ns / 1.17 us / 137.8 us / 472 nsfio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 7.56 MB/s (1.8k) | 38.16 MB/s (596)
Write | 7.59 MB/s (1.8k) | 38.46 MB/s (600)
Total | 15.16 MB/s (3.7k) | 76.62 MB/s (1.1k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 37.31 MB/s (72) | 37.00 MB/s (36)
Write | 39.31 MB/s (76) | 39.65 MB/s (38)
Total | 76.63 MB/s (148) | 76.66 MB/s (74)
#FIO full write pass
writefile: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (W) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (T) 1024KiB-1024KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=200
fio-3.7
Starting 1 process
writefile: Laying out IO file (1 file / 10240MiB)
writefile: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=30854: Tue Jan 5 16:35:54 2021
write: IOPS=74, BW=74.8MiB/s (78.5MB/s)(10.0GiB/136867msec)
slat (usec): min=8, max=401431, avg=13009.29, stdev=35003.85
clat (msec): min=976, max=4315, avg=2655.81, stdev=201.12
lat (msec): min=976, max=4315, avg=2668.83, stdev=204.07
clat percentiles (msec):
| 1.00th=[ 1737], 5.00th=[ 2635], 10.00th=[ 2635], 20.00th=[ 2635],
| 30.00th=[ 2668], 40.00th=[ 2668], 50.00th=[ 2668], 60.00th=[ 2668],
| 70.00th=[ 2668], 80.00th=[ 2668], 90.00th=[ 2668], 95.00th=[ 2769],
| 99.00th=[ 3540], 99.50th=[ 3675], 99.90th=[ 4212], 99.95th=[ 4212],
| 99.99th=[ 4329]
bw ( KiB/s): min= 2048, max=212992, per=99.40%, avg=76155.04, stdev=13951.54, samples=270
iops : min= 2, max= 208, avg=74.33, stdev=13.63, samples=270
lat (msec) : 1000=0.02%
cpu : usr=1.44%, sys=0.13%, ctx=1405, majf=0, minf=10
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.2%, 32=0.3%, >=64=99.4%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
issued rwts: total=0,10240,0,1 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=200
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=74.8MiB/s (78.5MB/s), 74.8MiB/s-74.8MiB/s (78.5MB/s-78.5MB/s), io=10.0GiB (10.7GB), run=136867-136867msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=4/10414, merge=0/4, ticks=6527/16922060, in_queue=16923349, util=9.00%
#FIO rand read
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=128
...
fio-3.7
Starting 4 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=30858: Tue Jan 5 16:36:25 2021
read: IOPS=3791, BW=14.8MiB/s (15.5MB/s)(445MiB/30033msec)
slat (nsec): min=1832, max=21089k, avg=1050410.92, stdev=2778297.58
clat (usec): min=705, max=171180, avg=133773.08, stdev=6267.82
lat (usec): min=711, max=171183, avg=134824.10, stdev=6187.07
clat percentiles (msec):
| 1.00th=[ 126], 5.00th=[ 126], 10.00th=[ 127], 20.00th=[ 128],
| 30.00th=[ 134], 40.00th=[ 136], 50.00th=[ 136], 60.00th=[ 136],
| 70.00th=[ 136], 80.00th=[ 136], 90.00th=[ 136], 95.00th=[ 144],
| 99.00th=[ 146], 99.50th=[ 146], 99.90th=[ 148], 99.95th=[ 155],
| 99.99th=[ 165]
bw ( KiB/s): min= 2746, max= 3952, per=24.91%, avg=3778.01, stdev=118.80, samples=240
iops : min= 686, max= 988, avg=944.50, stdev=29.72, samples=240
lat (usec) : 750=0.01%
lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.08%, 100=0.21%
lat (msec) : 250=99.69%
cpu : usr=0.31%, sys=0.43%, ctx=14280, majf=0, minf=548
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
issued rwts: total=113861,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=128
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=14.8MiB/s (15.5MB/s), 14.8MiB/s-14.8MiB/s (15.5MB/s-15.5MB/s), io=445MiB (466MB), run=30033-30033msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=113352/2, merge=0/0, ticks=3754819/126, in_queue=3736875, util=99.61%
#FIO rand write
benchmark: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=128
...
fio-3.7
Starting 4 processes
benchmark: (groupid=0, jobs=4): err= 0: pid=30864: Tue Jan 5 16:36:56 2021
write: IOPS=3791, BW=14.8MiB/s (15.5MB/s)(445MiB/30034msec)
slat (nsec): min=1972, max=19064k, avg=1050205.92, stdev=2776178.64
clat (msec): min=3, max=171, avg=133.78, stdev= 6.20
lat (msec): min=3, max=171, avg=134.83, stdev= 6.08
clat percentiles (msec):
| 1.00th=[ 126], 5.00th=[ 126], 10.00th=[ 127], 20.00th=[ 128],
| 30.00th=[ 136], 40.00th=[ 136], 50.00th=[ 136], 60.00th=[ 136],
| 70.00th=[ 136], 80.00th=[ 136], 90.00th=[ 136], 95.00th=[ 144],
| 99.00th=[ 146], 99.50th=[ 146], 99.90th=[ 153], 99.95th=[ 155],
| 99.99th=[ 165]
bw ( KiB/s): min= 2792, max= 4023, per=24.91%, avg=3777.96, stdev=114.04, samples=240
iops : min= 698, max= 1005, avg=944.49, stdev=28.50, samples=240
lat (msec) : 4=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.08%, 100=0.23%, 250=99.68%
cpu : usr=0.36%, sys=0.47%, ctx=14266, majf=0, minf=36
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=99.8%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
issued rwts: total=0,113868,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=128
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=14.8MiB/s (15.5MB/s), 14.8MiB/s-14.8MiB/s (15.5MB/s-15.5MB/s), io=445MiB (466MB), run=30034-30034msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=0/113351, merge=0/0, ticks=0/3754735, in_queue=3737870, util=99.37%使用 Superbench脚本测试。
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 1.92 Mbit/s 50.54 Mbit/s 16.19 ms
Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 0 Mbit/s -
Nanjing 5G CT 1.91 Mbit/s 47.90 Mbit/s 7.55 ms
Hefei 5G CT 1.92 Mbit/s 47.84 Mbit/s 10.57 ms
Guangzhou 5G CT 1.97 Mbit/s 49.69 Mbit/s 31.17 ms
TianJin 5G CU 1.93 Mbit/s 50.44 Mbit/s 19.65 ms
Shanghai 5G CU 1.90 Mbit/s 47.98 Mbit/s 1.24 ms
Tianjin 5G CM 1.92 Mbit/s 48.66 Mbit/s 27.28 ms
Wuxi 5G CM 1.92 Mbit/s 48.63 Mbit/s 10.41 ms
Nanjing 5G CM 1.91 Mbit/s 47.39 Mbit/s 10.81 ms
Hefei 5G CM 1.94 Mbit/s 47.98 Mbit/s 15.42 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------使用 LemonBench 脚本测试。
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Ping Latency
Speedtest Default 0.23 MB/s 6.00 MB/s 18.18 ms
China, Jilin CU 0.23 MB/s 6.07 MB/s 41.26 ms
China, Shandong CU 0.22 MB/s 5.77 MB/s 28.26 ms
China, Nanjing CU 0.24 MB/s 5.82 MB/s 7.49 ms
China, Shanghai CU 0.24 MB/s 5.75 MB/s 1.24 ms
China, Lanzhou CU Fail: Unknown Error
China, Beijing CT Fail: Unknown Error
China, Hangzhou CT 0.23 MB/s 5.79 MB/s 5.50 ms
China, Nanjing CT 0.22 MB/s 5.70 MB/s 8.94 ms
China, Guangzhou CT 0.23 MB/s 6.86 MB/s 30.02 ms
China, Wuhan CT 0.23 MB/s 5.74 MB/s 18.40 ms
China, Shenyang CM 0.23 MB/s 5.82 MB/s 39.42 ms
China, Hangzhou CM 0.24 MB/s 5.77 MB/s 17.65 ms
China, Nanning CM 0.23 MB/s 5.86 MB/s 50.64 ms
China, Lanzhou CM 0.23 MB/s 5.88 MB/s 46.02 ms
Hong Kong, HGC 0.15 MB/s 5.79 MB/s 52.86 ms
Hong Kong, CSL 0.23 MB/s 0.70 MB/s 44.04 ms
Hong Kong, PCCW Fail: Unknown Error
Korea, SK [Kdatacenter] 0.23 MB/s 0.27 MB/s 41.41 ms
Japan, NTT [fdcservers] 0.24 MB/s 0.30 MB/s 63.57 ms
Japan, NTT [i3d] Fail: Unknown Error
Japan GLBB 0.24 MB/s 0.11 MB/s 275.13 ms
Japan Rakuten 0.23 MB/s 1.71 MB/s 58.26 ms
Taiwan, Seednet 0.13 MB/s 5.87 MB/s 59.95 ms
Taiwan, HiNet 0.24 MB/s 6.00 MB/s 50.90 ms
Taiwan, TFN 0.16 MB/s 5.85 MB/s 53.42 ms
Singapore, Singtel 0.24 MB/s 6.77 MB/s 306.33 ms
Singapore, M1 0.26 MB/s 0.17 MB/s 307.53 ms
Singapore, NME 0.21 MB/s 7.15 MB/s 66.76 ms
United States, Century Link 0.25 MB/s 0.11 MB/s 182.87 ms
United States, Verizon Fail: Unknown Error
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| 区域 | 最快/最慢 | 平均 |
|---|---|---|
| 全网 | 上海(bgp) 2.8ms/新西兰奥克兰(globicom.co.nz) 3603.0ms | 176.7ms |
| 移动 | 江苏常州(移动) 5.9ms/湖南益阳(移动) 530.4ms | 56.1ms |
| 联通 | 江苏连云港(联通) 9.8ms/吉林延边(联通) 46.4ms | 26.4ms |
| 电信 | 上海(电信) 3.9ms/云南昆明(电信) 45.9ms | 23.6ms |
| 华南 | 广东广州(腾讯云) 28.6ms / 广东深圳(天威-bgp) 45.2ms | 34.4ms |
| 华北 | 天津(腾讯云) 20.4ms / 北京(移动云) 38.5ms | 27.6ms |
| 华东 | 上海(bgp) 2.8ms / 江苏南通(移动) 119.7ms | 15.0ms |
| 华中 | 河南洛阳(bgp) 19.3ms / 湖南益阳(移动) 530.4ms | 85.7ms |
| 东北 | 辽宁沈阳(联通-云端 2) 36.3ms / 辽宁沈阳(移动) 55.2ms | 44.6ms |
| 西北 | 陕西西安(移动云) 28.8ms / 陕西西安(移动云) 28.8ms | 28.8ms |
| 西南 | 山东济南(移动云) 18.3ms / 云南昆明(移动) 55.7ms | 40.0ms |
| 港澳台 | 香港(腾讯云-轻量) 29.3ms / 香港(stacksnet.com) 330.9ms | 86.0ms |
| 亚洲 | 韩国首尔(4090.cn) 27.3ms/日本东京 711.7ms | 185.6ms |
| 欧洲 | 俄罗斯伯力 92.8ms/芬兰哈米纳(GCP) 380.4ms | 249.9ms |
| 非洲 | 南非约翰内斯堡(runidc.com) 191.4ms/南非约翰内斯堡(华为云) 423.8ms | 320.6ms |
| 北美洲 | 美国圣何塞(腾讯云) 129.9ms/墨西哥普埃布拉 326.9ms | 203.7ms |
| 南美洲 | 巴西里约热内卢 299.4ms/智利瓦尔迪维亚 483.2ms | 378.4ms |
| 大洋洲 | 澳大利亚悉尼(AMAZON-LIGHTSAIL) 164.9ms/新西兰奥克兰(globicom.co.nz) 3603.0ms | 504.5ms |
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: 10-23-107-24: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.19.0-9.el7.ucloud.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Mon Sep 28 10:29:09 UTC 2020
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake) (4988.3 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
16:37:26 up 1 day, 49 min, 2 users, load average: 2.17, 1.26, 0.54; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 05 2021 16:37:26 - 17:05:28
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 39250964.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4683.3 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4915.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 718302.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 217004.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1408054.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1302544.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 263283.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11682.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5726.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 739.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1003677.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 39250964.9 3363.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4683.3 851.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 4915.4 1143.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 718302.5 1813.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 217004.9 1311.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1408054.4 2427.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1302544.1 1047.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 263283.5 658.2
Process Creation 126.0 11682.1 927.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5726.1 1350.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 739.2 1231.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1003677.4 669.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1241.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 05 2021 17:05:28 - 17:33:30
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38893710.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4670.4 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4792.1 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 654580.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 217516.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1391127.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1310590.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 264926.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11501.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5763.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 747.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1003968.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38893710.4 3332.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4670.4 849.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 4792.1 1114.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 654580.1 1653.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 217516.6 1314.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1391127.2 2398.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1310590.0 1053.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 264926.3 662.3
Process Creation 126.0 11501.0 912.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5763.9 1359.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 747.8 1246.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1003968.7 669.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1229.0sysbench 1.0.17 (using system LuaJIT 2.0.4)
Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 1
Initializing random number generator from current time
Prime numbers limit: 20000
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
CPU speed:
events per second: 407.89
General statistics:
total time: 10.0010s
total number of events: 4080
Latency (ms):
min: 2.38
avg: 2.45
max: 3.24
95th percentile: 2.86
sum: 9993.97
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 4080.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 9.9940/0.00sysbench 1.0.17 (using system LuaJIT 2.0.4)
Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 1
Initializing random number generator from current time
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 44316973 (4430902.78 per second)
43278.29 MiB transferred (4327.05 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 44316973
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 0.18
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 4305.55
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 44316973.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 4.3056/0.00Running Gathering system information
System Information
Operating System Linux 4.19.0-9.el7.ucloud.x86_64 x86_64
Model Red Hat KVM
Motherboard N/A
BIOS SeaBIOS 1.10.2-3.el7_4.1
Processor Information
Name Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake)
Topology 1 Processor, 1 Core
Identifier GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 85 Stepping 6
Base Frequency 2.49 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache 32.0 KB
L1 Data Cache 32.0 KB
L2 Cache 4.00 MB
L3 Cache 16.0 MB
Memory Information
Size 1.87 GB
Upload succeeded. Visit the following link and view your results online:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5713421文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载,若此文章存在违规行为，您可以联系管理员删除。
转载请注明本文地址：https://www.ucloud.cn/yun/125979.html
摘要：本文于更新，部分内容具有时效性，如有失效，请留言昨天，金秋狂欢盛典金秋狂欢盛典暨乌兰察布上新首促活动上线了，内蒙古乌兰察布快杰共享型云服务器核低至元个月或元年企业新用户，低至元个月或元年个人新用户。 本文于 2021-10-12 08:36 更新，部分内容具有时效性，如有失效，请留言 昨天，UCloud金秋狂欢盛典暨乌兰察布上新首促活动上线了，内蒙古乌兰察布快杰共...
摘要：优刻得云主机销售价格总体来说是比较实惠的了，目前国内主流商家当中核内存给带宽的云服务器只需元首年是比较少的了。 文章目录一、UCloud优刻得官网二、快杰云主机低至1折UCloud优刻得怎么样？UCloud优刻得是一家国内知名云计算品牌，大企业，上市公司，隶属于优刻得科技股份有限公司旗下！近期优刻得新推出了快杰云主机，使用AMD 2代EPYC处理器，主频高达 2.9GHz，进一步提...
前几年我们可能对于UCloud（优刻得）服务商并不是特别了解，确实是因为商家主打的企业渠道业务，所以我们个人用到的也不多。即便要使用价格也在同行中是相对比较高的，所以我们也不会去选择。2019年公司创业板上市之后，可能考虑到的业务扩展，开始通过新人促销活动来吸引到个人和大众企业的用户群。 目前，我们可以看到UCloud优刻得快杰云服务器新人福利优惠还是力度比较大的。其中我们可以选择香港、上海...
阅读 3167·2023-04-25 20:09
阅读 3363·2022-06-28 19:00
阅读 2715·2022-06-28 19:00
阅读 2718·2022-06-28 19:00
阅读 2662·2022-06-28 19:00
阅读 2518·2022-06-28 19:00
阅读 2632·2022-06-28 19:00
阅读 2326·2022-06-28 19:00
